Linked below is Tom Morrissey's reply to comments made by NESCAUM regarding part 1 of the previously posed Review. Two of Woodstock Soapstone's stoves (with similar model numbers) were certified to EPA 2020 standards using two different approved test methods on two different dates. These tests are available online. NESCAUM is alleging that the reports & stoves are the same (they are not), and that the "similarity in the appliances and their close proximity in test dates caused significant confusion for the reviewers." This response was written to allay any confusion NESCAUM may have regarding these fully disclosed and publicly available test results.
Friday, July 9, 2021
NESCAUM Review: Part 2B
Linked below is Part 2b of Tom Morrissey's review of the NESCAUM "Assessment". Part 2b focuses on density, data, and invalid test runs.
NESCAUM was unable to achieve the required density in a majority of its tests reviewed, rendering these tests invalid and raising red flags about their methods. Appended to Part 2b are 10 pages of emails written during the week of 7/5/2021 between Tom and the EPA, in which they try to derive whether NESCAUM meets the requirements of its own proposed standard in runs documented to EPA. The data sets for ALT-140 are very small, but even now there are obvious problems with load density, large coal beds, and representative low burns meeting the criteria spelled out in ALT-140.
Click to Read |
Friday, June 18, 2021
More About the Cordwood Test Method War
Almost concurrent with the release of our “Review Part 1” statement on May 15th, nine State Attorney Generals (from states VT, MA, RI, NY, NJ, MD, WA, OR, and AK) sent a letter to the EPA. The letter urged the EPA to revoke the current cordwood test method (ASTM E-3053) and adopt the new method (IDCTM) proposed by NYSERDA.
The EPA is currently using two labs (one in OR, one in CT) to test the proposed new method. Three different stoves will be run through multiple tests to ascertain (1). If test results can be replicated over subsequent burns in the same lab, and (2). If test results can be replicated in two different labs.
We expect these results to be slowly forthcoming over the next two months.
Linked below is part 2a from Tom Morrissey’s review of the “Assessment” and proposed new test method (IDCTM). This part of the review delves into the “low” and “medium” burn rate measurements used in the current EPA certification process, a focus of NESCAUM’s criticism.
Also discussed at length in this review is how the NESCAUM test method proposes to measure efficiency. Stove efficiency results reported thus far by NESCAUM for tests using its proposed method are unexpectedly low, likely to be attributed to the test protocol having different beginning and end points (discussed in “Part 2a” of Tom Morrissey’s review).
Another point of concern is the lack of test calculation transparency. Test developers (NESCAUM/NYSERDA) refuse to disclose the data and sample calculations so that their method of calculating efficiency can be explained and verified. This is very odd behavior for “public servants”.
Thursday, June 17, 2021
A New War Over the Accuracy of Cordwood Test Methods
In March of this year the Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management (NESCAUM) published an attack on the EPA wood stove certification process.
The document, entitled “Assessment of EPA’s Residential Wood Heater Program”, claims that the EPA process is dysfunctional and a systemic failure. In addition, the document attacks test labs that perform the wood stove certification tests, the third-party reviewers who certify these test reports for the EPA, and alleges collusion between manufacturers and test labs. In short, it attacks every entity in the wood stove testing and certification process.
Almost simultaneously with the publication of the “Assessment”, NESCAUM released its own new woodstove test method. Their “Integrated Duty-Cycle Test Method (“IDCTM”) is alleged to solve all problems NESCAUM had identified with both the current EPA test methods and also with the participants in the certification process: manufacturers, test labs, third-party certifiers, and the EPA itself.
In the “Assessment,” NESCAUM makes various claims that are deeply colored by bias and conflict of interest, untrue, or factually incorrect. Appended to this blog post is a response to NESCAUM’s “Assessment” by Tom Morrissey, President of Woodstock Soapstone Company.
Tom’s response, “Review Part 1”, is the first of what will likely be a number of posts on this topic.
At issue are the accuracy of NESCAUM’s claims, the way both emissions and efficiency are measured going forward, the accuracy of cordwood test methods, the cost of compliance testing and regulatory approval, and the barriers to both entry and innovation in this market. Stay tuned.
Click Here to Read Tom Morrissey’s Response
Thursday, February 25, 2021
Wood Stove Home Cooking: Sweet Potato & Black Bean Chili for Two
Recipe from EatingWell's Test Kitchen
- 2 teaspoons extra-virgin olive oil
- 1 small onion, finely diced
- 1 small sweet potato, peeled and diced
- 2 cloves garlic, minced
- 1 tablespoon chili powder
- 2 teaspoons ground cumin
- 1/4 teaspoon ground chipotle chile
- ⅛ teaspoon salt, or to taste
- 1 ⅓ cups water
- 1 15-ounce can black beans, rinsed
- 1 cup canned diced tomatoes
- 2 teaspoons lime juice
- 2 tablespoons chopped fresh cilantro
Saturday, February 20, 2021
Recent Posts
- 2019-2020 Wood Stove Purchases Eligible for $300 Tax Credit 2/19/21
- Save Up to $1000 (Or More) With the 2021 Tax Credit for High Performance Wood Stoves! 2/8/21
- Working in Isolation 3/30/2020
- Exceeding 2020 EPA Standards Since 1995! 2/07/2020
- Customer Images Keep Rolling In! 1/21/2020
- Customer Installations! 1/9/2020
- And the Free Stove Winner Is... 12/31/19
- What a Hybrid Wood Fire Looks Like! 11/27/19
- A (Palladian) Phoenix Rises: The Restoration of a Damaged Palladian Wood Stove 6/19/19
- New Product Development - Custom Architectural Steel? 4/18/19
- Stove Stories: Navajo Dual Fuel Hybrid & Survival Hybrid Wood Stove 3/11/19
- February Steal YOUR HEART IS IN MY HEART 02/12/19
- Hot Buzz in the Summertime 07/06/18
- Hot Diggity 06/08/18
- Harmony and Balance 05/10/18
- Arbor Day! 04/10/18
- News Update: Navajo Stove Project 04/04/18
- Luck of the Irish 03/10/18
- Federal Tax Credit Instated for 2017 2/14/18
- It's Seed Catalogue Time! 02/09/18
- Photos of our Newest Survival Stove 01/19/18
Friday, February 19, 2021
2019-2020 Wood Stove Purchases Eligible for $300 Tax Credit
If you Purchased a Woodstock Soapstone Wood Stove between January 2019 & December 2020 a $300 Tax Credit is Still Available
Additional Savings on Wood Stoves for Vermont Homeowners
more about the $500-$600 Vermont Rebate here.
Wood Heat Recognized as a Green Energy Source
Friday, February 5, 2021
Save Up to $1000 (Or More) With the 2021 Tax Credit for High Performance Wood Stoves!
New 26% Tax Credit Applies to Stove Purchase Price and Any Related Costs for Installation
The Biomass Thermal Energy Council (BTEC) has been working to implement the Biomass Thermal Utilization (BTU) act for more than a decade - and it’s finally been realized! On December 21st 2020, Congress signed into law a 26% federal tax credit for wood stoves AND wood stove installations complying with these BTU revisions…Meaning more accessibility to clean-burning and modern wood heat for you.
What makes a wood stove eligible for the huge 26% tax credit?
- The stove must meet the 2020 EPA standards
- The stove must have a minimum efficiency of 75% (HHV). More about High Heat Value (HHV) below.
- The stove must be purchased and installed in 2021-2022 (there will be a 22% credit available for 2023)
Lucky for you, ALL Woodstock Soapstone wood stoves are among the elite group that meet these qualifications.